Legal Notice: Nothing on the website constitutes professional and/or financial advice. All the content on the website is for informational purposes only. We have prepared all information herein from sources we believe to be accurate and reliable. However, such information is presented as is,” without warranty of any kind – whether expressed or implied. You acknowledge and agree that there are numerous risks associated with purchasing cryptocurrencies.
JELLYJELLY Price Surge Causes Chaos on Hyperliquid: A Detailed Breakdown
JELLYJELLY Price – Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange, faced a massive crisis when the price of the meme coin JELLYJELLY surged by 500%. A single trader, holding 124.6 million JELLYJELLY tokens worth $4.5 million, placed an $8 million short bet on the platform. This move exposed Hyperliquid’s liquidity vault to significant risk. However, things took a turn for the worse when the same trader, or potentially a connected party, simultaneously opened a massive long position, causing JELLYJELLY’s price to skyrocket.
This sudden price surge led to mass liquidations, allowing the trader to pocket huge profits. Analysts later revealed that this strategy was likely a deliberate attempt to exploit leverage, draining funds from Hyperliquid. Arkham’s investigation highlighted the trader’s attempt to manipulate the market, but the platform took swift action to prevent further damage.
Hyperliquid’s Swift Response and Recovery
In a bid to avoid a potential wipeout of its liquidity vault, Hyperliquid validators quickly intervened, resetting JELLYJELLY’s price to $0.0095, where the short position had originally been placed. This move allowed the platform to liquidate 392 million JELLYJELLY tokens, converting what could have been a $12 million disaster into a manageable $703K profit.
To prevent further market manipulation, Hyperliquid shut down all open JELLYJELLY positions and removed the token from its platform. In addition, the exchange promised to reimburse affected users, though those suspected of involvement in the manipulation scheme would not receive compensation.
Impact on Hyperliquid’s Reputation
Despite the platform’s quick action, opinions on its response were mixed. Some lauded the team’s decision to manage the situation, while others, including Bitget CEO Gracy Chen and Arthur Hayes, co-founder of BitMEX, criticized Hyperliquid for its centralized approach to problem-solving. The incident follows another recent liquidity scare, where a $200 million Ethereum long liquidation resulted in a $4 million loss, further eroding confidence in Hyperliquid and causing its native token, HYPE, to drop by 30% in the past month.
This series of events raises concerns about Hyperliquid’s long-term stability and its ability to handle market volatility.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Cryptocurrencies and stocks, particularly in micro-cap companies, are subject to significant volatility and risk. Please conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions.
Since 2022, Ecem has been creating digital content, combining her passion for technology with writing. Continuing her education in the Mathematics department, Ecem focuses on producing in-depth content on areas such as blockchain, artificial intelligence, and cryptocurrency. She aims to simplify these topics and present them to a wide audience, sharing valuable insights into the crypto industry through her writing. With her innovative content, she strives to raise awareness in the digital world.
Leave a comment