HBO Bitcoin Documentary Sparks Controversy Over Satoshi’s Identity

HBO Bitcoin Documentary The Truth About Satoshi Nakamoto

HBO Bitcoin Documentary– Following the recent release of the HBO documentary Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery the focus has shifted to its claims regarding Bitcoin’s enigmatic creator. Former Bitcoin Core developer Gregory Maxwell has pointed out significant flaws in filmmaker Cullen Hoback’s assertion that another early Bitcoin developer, Peter Todd, is the pseudonymous figure behind Satoshi Nakamoto.

Documentary Highlights and Claims

The nearly two-hour documentary purports to be a comprehensive investigation aimed at unraveling one of the internet’s greatest mysteries. It features interviews with various individuals involved in Bitcoin and analyzes numerous clues before ultimately naming Todd as Satoshi. However, Todd promptly denied the allegations, suggesting the documentary may have overlooked critical details.

Central to Hoback’s argument is a 2010 response to Satoshi on the BitcoinTalk forum, where Todd allegedly completed Satoshi’s post using his own account. Following this interaction, both accounts fell silent, although Todd later introduced the replace-by-fee feature—a concept discussed in the same thread. This feature allows users to expedite an unconfirmed transaction by substituting it with one that has a higher fee.

The documentary also claims to support its findings by pointing to Todd’s use of the pseudonym John Dillon, the shared British/Canadian spellings between Satoshi and Todd, and Todd’s posting habits that aligned with his student schedule. Additionally, Hoback noted that Todd had once mentioned sacrificing bitcoins, implying this referred to Satoshi’s estimated 1.1 million BTC, valued at approximately $68 billion.

Maxwell’s Counterarguments

In response to the documentary, Maxwell articulated his concerns in an online discussion, stating, “At the time petertodd’s account was named ‘retep’ and didn’t have any immediately obvious connection to his identity. If there had been a slipup he could have just abandoned the account and certainly not later had it renamed to his legal name!”

He also cautioned against hastily accusing others of being Satoshi, highlighting that such allegations have led to harassment and threats against innocent parties in the past. Todd acknowledged Maxwell’s point, suggesting that Hoback, had he genuinely sought to uncover Satoshi’s identity, would have consulted with Maxwell and himself to identify any flaws in his theories. But he didn’t want to do that. He wanted to make a profitable documentary. So he never asked us if there were flaws in his theory, Todd added.

The Fallout and Community Reaction

Prior to the documentary’s airing, the decentralized prediction market Polymarket generated significant buzz, with over $44 million in volume as users speculated about Satoshi’s identity. Leading contenders included Len Sassaman, Nick Szabo, Adam Back, and David Kleiman, with probabilities fluctuating around 8% for the top three names. Notably, Todd was not listed as a contender by Polymarket users.

After the documentary’s release, it faced intense scrutiny from the crypto community. Many took to social media to criticize the film’s conclusions, echoing previous instances where similar claims had been debunked. The ongoing mystery surrounding Bitcoin’s creator remains unresolved, with many advocates arguing it should stay that way, preserving the allure and intrigue that has surrounded Satoshi Nakamoto for years.

FAQs