Crypto News- Smart contract failures can be a harsh lesson for crypto projects, as demonstrated by the recent ordeal of Banana Gun. This freshly launched token embarked on a tumultuous journey, experiencing rapid price surges, crashes, and eventually, a contract meltdown, all unfolding within a matter of hours.
Banana Gun, the Newest Crypto Project, Inflicts Losses on DeFi Community Due to Contract Flaw
In the aftermath of its launch, the Banana Gun project found itself grappling with a troublesome smart contract glitch, ultimately spelling doom for the BANANA token.
The Saga of the Big BANANA Dump:
Even in a bearish crypto market, there exists a particular breed of enthusiasts known as “degens” who willingly leap into speculative projects, chasing the promise of quick wealth. Banana Gun emerged as the latest fascination among degens, a Telegram trading bot project that rode on the coattails of Unibot’s prior success.
On the 12th of September, crypto enthusiast Kyle Chassé observed the sudden emergence of a new trading pair on Uniswap, BANANA/wETH, which swiftly ballooned to a fully diluted value of nearly $68 million.
The nascent BANANA token embarked on an exhilarating ascent, reaching an impressive high of $8.70, only to endure a breathtaking crash, plummeting to a meager $0.02 within a mere three-hour span. Speculations ran rampant about a possible “rug pull,” a deceptive maneuver often orchestrated by project teams to drain liquidity and make a swift exit with investors’ funds. However, the Banana Gun project team presented an alternative explanation.
The project team candidly acknowledged the presence of a critical bug within their smart contract, lamenting, “We have a bug in our contract we cannot hotfix.” They further elucidated that despite undergoing two separate audits, an inherent flaw in their contract related to tax calculations had allowed users to sell their tokens while still retaining tax tokens in their wallets.
To rectify this dire situation, they devised a two-pronged plan: firstly, the team opted to sell off the treasury wallet to deplete the locked liquidity pool, thereby facilitating its reuse for the new contract. Secondly, they committed to relaunching the project at the earliest opportunity, accompanied by an airdrop intended to compensate all affected users.
A few hours later, the team appended, “This is undoubtedly a challenging situation, but we are unwavering in our commitment to making it right. We have subjected our new contract to rigorous auditing, and we will not proceed until we are confident that everything is in impeccable order.”
The Twist with ChatGPT’s Involvement:
The narrative takes an intriguing turn as a pseudonymous coder claimed to have harnessed the capabilities of OpenAI’s ChatGPT to uncover the pivotal flaw in the contract.
“Banan had asserted that they had undergone two audits. So, I decided to request a third audit from my trusted ‘auditor’: ChatGPT. Astonishingly, ChatGPT pinpointed the bug.”
The incident involving the Banana Gun project serves as an illuminating testament to the ever-increasing importance of thorough smart contract auditing. It provides a poignant reminder of the critical role that emerging technologies, particularly AI-powered tools, can play in uncovering vulnerabilities that might otherwise slip through the cracks in traditional audit processes.
Furthermore, this incident holds profound implications not only for crypto projects but also for the broader ecosystem of investors and participants in the dynamic and rapidly evolving landscape of decentralized finance (DeFi).
In recent years, the cryptocurrency and blockchain space has witnessed an explosive proliferation of projects and tokens, driven by the allure of financial innovation and decentralization. While these innovations hold immense promise, they are often accompanied by a commensurate increase in risks.
One of the most potent and immediate threats in this realm is the vulnerability of smart contracts. These self-executing contracts underpin a multitude of DeFi applications, enabling automated transactions and governance on blockchain networks. However, their intricate and complex nature also renders them susceptible to coding errors, oversights, or malicious exploitation.
Leave a comment