CDS Crypto News EU Regulatory Body Suggests Rearranging Blockchain Transactions Could Constitute Market Abuse
Crypto News

EU Regulatory Body Suggests Rearranging Blockchain Transactions Could Constitute Market Abuse

Some policy experts argue that Maximum Extractable Value (MEV), a practice where blockchain operators rearrange transactions to maximize profits, isn't inherently negative. However, it often comes at the expense of those initiating the transactions.

60
EU Regulatory Body Suggests Rearranging Blockchain Transactions Could Constitute Market Abuse

Crypto News– The European Union’s market regulator has raised concerns over the practice of maximum extractable value (MEV), where blockchain operators manipulate user transactions to maximize their own profits.

EU Regulatory Body Suggests Rearranging Blockchain Transactions Could Constitute Market Abuse

This stance, outlined in regulatory proposals by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) under the digital assets law known as MiCA, has sparked debate within the industry. MEV, broadly defined, refers to trading strategies employed by blockchain operators to gain extra profits by rearranging the transaction queue or frontrunning transactions just before they are added to the blockchain ledger.

MEV is frequently referred to as an invisible tax on users due to its impact on end-user profits, with tactics like sandwich attacks and frontrunning directly diminishing profits. Despite being a contentious topic, some industry proponents argue that MEV can have a positive effect overall by enhancing blockchain network efficiency.

Beyond the Scope?

Some observers of crypto policy have contended that MEV falls outside the scope of MiCA, and the European Union Cryptocurrency Institute (EUCI) has cautioned that applying MiCA to MEV could result in excessive regulation. While it is accurate that the MiCA text does not explicitly address MEV, ESMA’s consultation on proposals to address market abuse acknowledges that the legislation broadens the EU’s existing market abuse regulations to encompass reporting suspicious activities arising not only from transactions but also from ‘the functioning of distributed ledger technology such as the consensus mechanism.’

ESMA also highlighted that MiCA does not mandate crypto service providers to report activities such as scams, payment fraud, or account takeovers. Peter Kerstens, an advisor to the European Commission on financial sector digitalization and cybersecurity, expressed that MEV is neither inherently positive nor negative but may raise concerns regarding market integrity. Investors expect that blockchain transactions will be validated in the sequence they were submitted, and MEV reordering can result in frontrunning. This means that validators operating blockchains may prioritize their own transactions ahead of others to gain additional profits, as outlined by Kerstens.

Seeking clear regulatory guidance

The legislation, known as Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA), was completed last year, making the EU the first major jurisdiction to regulate the rapidly growing digital assets sector comprehensively. ESMA and the European Banking Authority (EBA) have been seeking feedback and consulting on the measures and guidance mandated under MiCA. Industry experts are actively engaging with these regulatory bodies to enhance clarity on the rules, especially for different service providers

EU Regulatory Body Suggests Rearranging Blockchain Transactions Could Constitute Market Abuse

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Crypto News – The Uncertainty of BTC: Deep Correction for Bitcoin Price

Crypto News - The Uncertainty of BTC: Deep Correction for Bitcoin Price

Crypto News – The Future of Solana Price: Predictions for All-Time High

Crypto News - The Future of Solana Price: Predictions for All-Time High

Crypto News – Spot Ether ETF Approval: How the SEC’s Delayed Approval Will Affect the Crypto Market?

Crypto News - Spot Ether ETF Approval: How the SEC's Delayed Approval...

Crypto News Today- Genesis Global Receives Court Approval for $3B Payout

Judge Lane stated that any funds available for distribution by Genesis are...